[fblike]

Follow us on facebook

Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

Victim Fatigue in the case of Thomas Kwoyelo

July 1, 2019
in Featured, Insights
0
0
Victim Fatigue in the case of Thomas Kwoyelo

Thomas Kwoyelo sits in the dock in Gulu (Photo: Foundation for Justice and Development Initiatives (FJDI)/Twitter)

FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

The Trial of Thomas Kwoyelo – a former Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) leader – is at the centre of efforts by the International Crimes Division (ICD) of the High Court of Uganda to bring accountability and justice for crimes committed during the 20 year LRA conflict in Northern Uganda. Crucial to these efforts has been the desire to put victims at the centre of the trial process, not least by incorporating victims’ participation in the trial, argues Patricia Bako.

The trial has been ongoing since July 2011. Avocats Sans Frontières (ASF) has been monitoring the trial since its commencement as well as engaging the victims through outreach as part of its support for access to justice efforts and transitional justice mechanisms in Uganda. In April this year, ASF led joint efforts with the Victim’s Counsel, the ICD Registrar and the International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) to inform the victims’ communities of the latest trial developments, while collecting and relaying their views to relevant instances. These latest engagements have shown that victims’ right to participate in trials, a novel concept under Ugandan law, is at risk of remaining an empty concept as victims are disengaged from the prolonged and distant Court proceedings.

Lack of Information

During the various sessions held within the victims communities of Obiangic, Abera, Lamogi, Perecu and Pabbo, many participants deplored their lack of information about the developments in the case. However, at the same time, a substantial number of them showed a rising loss of interest in the case. As put by one of the participants:

‘This meeting is not important to us. We need to hear only results from the trial. This trial has been ongoing for so long. It should end soon so that we can get compensation for the harm we suffered.’

Perceivably, this attitude arises from two reasons.

First is the lack of direct involvement in the case. Although victims have been involved in the trial from its onset through their legal representatives (counsel), the victims themselves have not had the opportunity to be involved in the court proceedings. This is further reflected in the fact that in spite of the ruling in November last year, wherein 30 victims were allowed by the Court to participate in the trial, the modalities of this participation are yet to be defined by the Court.

The second reason is the protracted trial process. As noted above, the trial which commenced in July 2011, has been characterized by constant and lengthy adjournments, intermittent applications challenging the trial on the basis of amnesty as well as an undependable flow of resources to the Court to hear and adjudicate the case. Hearing of witnesses only commenced in March this year. In light of this, the legal entitlements encapsulated in the various statutes providing for participation of victims are at risk of being rendered meaningless if these concerns are not addressed.

Disillusionment

The victims’ feeling of disillusionment in the trial process shows that interim relief efforts, projects and interventions are either insufficient or ineffective in so much as they are not meeting the victims communities at their most critical points of need. This is in reference to government and non-government actors alike. Many victims propose that interim support is provided to them in form of treatment for the physical harm they suffered and as well as tangible financial assistance for them to be able to provide basic necessities, most crucially to meet the needs of the many orphans left behind by the war. This highlights the need for a holistic Transitional Justice strategy that sees to and ensures the crucial interplay between varying and symbiotic justice, lasting peace and development mechanisms and initiatives.

It is important therefore that any gaps between the Court process and the victims be closed if the victims are to ‘own’ the trial process and consider any outcome from the trial as a worthwhile effort towards justice, peace and accountability. Possible ways this can be done include enhancing management of victims expectations with regard to the trial, ensuring constant communication between the victims and their legal representatives, and better targeting of victims needs pending completion of the trial.

As the first case before the ICD and the first to incorporate victims participation in Uganda, it is essential that all relevant court structures be set up and processes streamlined by the Court, alongside support from stakeholders to ensure that victims participation be as meaningful and effective as possible and set the right precedent for future trials before the Court.

Tags: Lord's Resistance Army (LRA)Ugandavictims
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Patricia Bako

Bako Jane Patricia is a Lawyer by training who is enthusiastic about criminal justice with an international and national perspective, human rights and international Law. She has experience working with different organizations on the issues of international criminal justice, transitional justice, human rights, peace and security. From July 2010 to December 2011, She worked with Human Rights Network- Uganda as an Assistant Coordinator of the Uganda Coalition on the International Criminal Court (UCICC). From January 2011 to June 2015, she worked as the Coordinator for UCICC. From January 2010 to date she has served as a part time lecturer with the Faculty of Law at Uganda Christian University. Currently, she works with Avocats Sans Frontieres- Uganda Mission as a Project Officer Transitional Justice, International Criminal Justice Program. Her areas of teaching and research interest include international criminal justice, Transitional justice, constitutional law, human rights and Jurisprudence.

Related Posts

How do We Create a Path to Justice in Yemen?
Featured

How do We Create a Path to Justice in Yemen?

by Mohammad Hadi Zakerhossein
July 17, 2019
0
622

On July 1 2019, the Iranian Center for International Criminal Law (ICICL)  filed a communication under Article 15 of the...

Read more
There can be no equivocation on the obligation to save people at risk of death in the Mediterranean

There can be no equivocation on the obligation to save people at risk of death in the Mediterranean

June 27, 2019
226
Journalist Shaun Matsheza on the prospects for justice in Zimbabwe

Journalist Shaun Matsheza on the prospects for justice in Zimbabwe

June 25, 2019
530
Calling Sexual Violence What It Is: Advancing the accountability agenda

Calling Sexual Violence What It Is: Advancing the accountability agenda

June 19, 2019
342
Maung Saungkha is pushing back against the censorial instincts of the Myanmar regime

Maung Saungkha is pushing back against the censorial instincts of the Myanmar regime

June 14, 2019
293

Patricia Bako

Bako Jane Patricia is a Lawyer by training who is enthusiastic about criminal justice with an international and national perspective, human rights and international Law. She has experience working with different organizations on the issues of international criminal justice, transitional justice, human rights, peace and security. From July 2010 to December 2011, She worked with Human Rights Network- Uganda as an Assistant Coordinator of the Uganda Coalition on the International Criminal Court (UCICC). From January 2011 to June 2015, she worked as the Coordinator for UCICC. From January 2010 to date she has served as a part time lecturer with the Faculty of Law at Uganda Christian University. Currently, she works with Avocats Sans Frontieres- Uganda Mission as a Project Officer Transitional Justice, International Criminal Justice Program. Her areas of teaching and research interest include international criminal justice, Transitional justice, constitutional law, human rights and Jurisprudence.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub reflects conversations on accountability and access to justice. We feature change-makers, researchers, and justice activists who make concrete the abstract concepts of Justice and Rule of Law. Justice Hub - alongside our sister project Hague Talks is powered by the Hague Project Peace and Justice – a network of over 200 Hague-based organisations working on peace and justice issues.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
Create New Account
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Victim Fatigue in the case of Thomas Kwoyelo