None of Bensouda's business?

Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - 10:41

By K M

Is the ICC prosecutor acting ultra vires - beyond her legal authority - when she warns individuals and groups in Nigeria who might disrupt the elections?

The ICC prosecutor recently issued a stern warning to individuals or groups who might engage in violence around the upcoming election in Nigeria. 

She reminded Nigerians that her office is still conducting a preliminary examination which has already concluded that, since July 2002, crimes have taken place in the country which could be tried at the ICC. She then states clearly that the ICC may also look into any crimes which may be committed around the elections.

“Any person who incites or engages in acts of violence including by ordering, requesting, encouraging or contributing in any other manner to the commission of crimes within ICC's jurisdiction is liable to prosecution either by Nigerian Courts or by ICC.”

The ICC is based on the principle of ‘complementarity’ as stated in the first article of the Rome Statute. This means the ICC only steps in when national courts are unable or unwilling to try individuals who allegedly commit genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity.

Nigeria ratified the Rome Statute on the 27th of September 2001. Bensouda’s Preliminary Examination report from last year, with a section on Nigeria, focuses on criminal acts attributed to Boko Haram.


States are still and shall remain the main players on the international plane

So, from the ICC prosecutor’s point of view, it is clear not only that crimes have been committed, but that she and the ICC may also have jurisdiction.

But, in my opinion, states are still and shall remain the main players on the international plane. They are powerful sovereign players. Of course by ratifying the Rome Statute, Nigeria accepted that the ICC may exercise its own powers: the ICC would not have got this ‘power’ if Nigeria itself had not granted it to the ICC.

Nevertheless, the responsibility of maintaining peace and order within the Nigerian territorial jurisdiction is an exclusive matter of the Nigerian government and its sovereign institutions. The pact which has been signed by the Nigerian leaders promising  to refrain from violence before, during and after the general election is an internal issue and binds the parties who signed it.

It is only if the Nigerian competent national courts fail to either investigate or try allegations concerning grave crimes such as crimes against humanity or genocide, that the ICC could step in and take the lead. The central function of the ICC prosecutor is to investigate crimes under the Rome Statute.


Deterrence can never be achieved through politicized statements

In my view, the deterrence and the preventive measures of the ICC can never be achieved through politicized statements issued by its prosecutor. The deterrent impact of the ICC is a long substantial and procedural process which can only be achieved through the rational jurisprudence of the ICC throughout the years. The ICC is still a young institution and has huge expectations riding on its shoulders: to support the rule of law, restore national and international justice and put an end to the legacy of the atrocities of the core crimes. 

Therefore the ICC should remain independent and avoid political statements in order to be able to underpin one of its main principles of complementarity: allowing ‘national courts’ to bring perpetrators to justice and only stepping in when they fail to do so.


The opinions in this piece are those of the author and do not reflect the opinons of Justice Hub.

K M is an international law student. 

David D Y Choi

Dear Org. Representative at Justice Hub and Visitors at this web site ; RE : Be bound to settle at 'Reliable Site' This is David D Y Choi, Who has been placed at limited status, incomeless condition as usual. While pursuing of basic living cost from my work basis secure income source, I am sending this signal, ‘SoS', to be contacted by open minded personnel under the Sky. Any of reply, advice, suggestion is welcomed via e-mailed notice, through personal e-mail addresses : or Over the Broadcast ; My extraordinary case was disclosed via Austria Local media, at TV forum on the date of April 14, 2014, while I was dwelling at detention center in Austria, Vienna, my case was classified as 'Gov. Sanction'. This was keen story source among the local people in Austria. I joined at least 45 business sites, mostly pre-framed sites including of war and conflict zones during last decade or so. Over the film production ; I may be eligible to offer my extra case as the film, joined at least 45 business sites, mostly pre-framed sites including of war and conflict zones such as Iraq, Congo, East-Timor, Cambodia etc. This resulted him naming of 'Asylum Seeker' in Austria. After the extraordinary case was disclosed via Austria Local media on the date of April 14, 2014, its story was key source at detention center in Austria, Vienna, Chanted by camp dwelling children, through the nick named story of ‘Frog’. Considering personal work experience, I did my best at various business sites in and out of the state. Among the joined sites, there mostly SoCs which makes me have fresh eyes basis vision new business development affairs. Here, David D Y Choi, would be the right person, who worked at least 45 different business sites, upon receiving of positive notice to be settled.

Since 2001, I have been placed at a lot of business site, including of war and conflict zone etc. Joined work site is at least 45 business placed while working as temporary hired status. Currently, I have sent tons of inquiry messages to have secure income source from my work. Meanwhile, there is no positive notice at all. Believing that, there, still, a reliable settlement site is in existence under the sky. For the detour way of approach, I am in searching of a reliable settlement site, should be named, ‘Reliable site’. To fulfill future originated career goal, I would like to send this enquiry message, whether there is a positive opportunity of settlement. 'Reliable Site' : Supporting, offering of basic accommodation until 'David' gets a secure income source & work permit 'David D Y Choi' : Offering of potential skills, fresh basis eyes vision would be eligible, worked at least 45 sites, incl. SoC affairs Step

1) I would like to be there, upon receiving of positive notice, will be reached at designated site within a few days. Believing that, acquiring of visiting visa toward 'Reliable Site', its procedure is not complicated as long as I follow current regulation, in there.

2) Would like to exchange mutual benefit, for the coming future as the long-term basis period. Between 2001 and 2013, joined work sites were recorded by at least 45, from SoC projects up to conflict zones. My potential skills from various work site basis work know-how, this would be key asset toward your region.

I am waiting of any of further notice from your side.


David D Y Choi, ( in case e-mail system is blocked ) Tel. : +82-19-378-4105 Personal URL : On the bottom of Personal URL, linked images are eligible, hand written images, between Apr. 2015 and Feb. 2016. ====

Saturday, December 31, 2016 - 03:26

Very intersting article . Yes she is acting beyond her authority. She should focous more on what to say and what on what should not be said

Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - 14:44

Just wanna remark on couple of general issues, The web site style is perfect, the subject matter is rattling excellent ekfaaebdckge

Thursday, February 19, 2015 - 15:24
Tamara van Dijk

Very interesting article. It's true and i agree with the author because such political statements taken beyond the aligned power or capacity of the ICC prosecutor could be very destructive and undermine the integrity of the International Criminal Law system represented by the ICC Hague based Tribunal. Well done Justice Hub!

Wednesday, February 18, 2015 - 13:06

Yes, the author is completely right in his arguments. Finally someone who dare to say this and is not afraid to criticise the ICC on this case. Very well done, big compliment. The ICC prosecutor should have saved her energy and influence and applied it in the critical situation in Libya or she could have made similar statements to push for an ICC Referral concerning the endless bloodbaths and atrocities taking place in Syria, or at least she could have pushed to address the dangerous situation in Ukraine instead of being very selective and making political statements which only targets the African Continent. Yet, I am totally against any political statements as it undermines the integrity of the court, and it is needless to say that the ICC is a pure judicial institution and it must avoid entering into the political fields. Thank you Justice Hub for providing those academic mind trigger articles.

Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - 12:10