[fblike]

Follow us on facebook

Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Is the United States guilty of aggression in Kobane?

October 26, 2014
in News
0
0
Is the United States guilty of aggression in Kobane?
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By Justice Hub

Did the United States commit an act of aggression by dropping weapons into the Syrian border town of Kobane without the approval of the Security Council and the Syrian government?

The US has air-dropped weapons to Syrian Kurds in Kobane. According to the US, the weapons will help the Kurdish belligerents to fight ISIS who has been besieging Kobane for more than five weeks.

The Syrian ambassador to the UN Bashar Jaafari said the US had not informed the Syrian government beforehand about the plans to deliver weapons to the Kurdish forces in Kobane.

Meanwhile, the UN Secretary General’s spokesperson Stephane Dujarric, said Ban Ki-Moon “takes note” of the US air drop of weapons, adding that he wants all actions to be within the “broad context of international law.”

During a press conference, Dujarric said he would not go further in his response concerning “whether the US air-dropped weapons without approval from the Security Council or the Syrian government is consistent with the international law”.

Is the US air-dropped weapons to Syrian Kurds in Kobane an act of aggression? And could it fit into the definition of ‘aggression’ which according to the UN General Assembly resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974 is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.

Since Dujarric declined to answer the legality of the US action concerning the air-dropped weapons into Kobane, who could? The International Court (ICJ) in the Nicaragua Case has confirmed the definition of aggression and elaborated on it. However, the facts in Kobane are completely different from the facts of Nicaragua Case. In Kobane, there is a non-state actor (ISIS) killing and terrifying civilians. The Syrian government, for its part, has failed to protect those civilians, and therefore the US is trying to revive and apply the R2P doctrine in Kobane.

It is worth mentioning here that the US does not support the rebels who are fighting against the Syrian government. The US is supporting the Kurds of Kobane, who do not receive any support from their own government in Damascus.

So could the US air-dropped weapons to the Kurds of Kobane be legally justified under the doctrine of R2P, and would such action ‘in the specific scenario of Kobane’ be consistent with the international law? What do you think?

 

Tags: aggressionJustice News
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice and peace.

Related Posts

ICL Media Review: Russian veterans seek ICC investigation into use of mercenaries in Syria
ICL Media Review

ICL Media Review: Russian veterans seek ICC investigation into use of mercenaries in Syria

by ICL Media Review
November 18, 2019
0
258

In this week's review, news about the ECCC conviction of Chea and Samphan for genocide, the adjournment of Kwoyelo’s trial...

Read more
ICL Media Review: Sri Lankan General Accused of War Crimes Promoted to Head of Army

ICL Media Review: Sri Lankan General Accused of War Crimes Promoted to Head of Army

August 26, 2019
160
ICL Media Review: Killing of Children Spikes in Mali in Possible Crimes Against Humanity

ICL Media Review: Killing of Children Spikes in Mali in Possible Crimes Against Humanity

August 17, 2019
112
ICL Media Review: Fears of Ethnic Cleansing in Kashmir Following India’s Revocation of Region’s Special Status

ICL Media Review: Fears of Ethnic Cleansing in Kashmir Following India’s Revocation of Region’s Special Status

August 10, 2019
103
NPWJ: More than 1,000 march in Warsaw in support of LGBT rights

NPWJ: More than 1,000 march in Warsaw in support of LGBT rights

August 5, 2019
140

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice and peace.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub reflects conversations on accountability and access to justice. We feature change-makers, researchers, and justice activists who make concrete the abstract concepts of Justice and Rule of Law. Justice Hub - alongside our sister project Hague Talks is powered by the Hague Project Peace and Justice – a network of over 200 Hague-based organisations working on peace and justice issues.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
Create New Account
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Is the United States guilty of aggression in Kobane?