The International Criminal Court (ICC) will hear arguments on August 21 about whether to grant Thomas Lubanga early release from imprisonment.
He was convicted three years ago of enlisting, conscripting, and using children under the age of 15 during the conflict in the Ituri region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). He was sentenced to 14 years in prison.
Three judges from the Appeals Chamber will decide whether Lubanga should serve his full sentence or if he can be set free after completing two-thirds of his sentence.
He was the first person to be tried at the ICC and has been in detention since March 2006, which means that July 2015 marks the completion of two-thirds of his sentence. Under ICC rules, when a prisoner has served two-thirds, the Court must review the sentence to decide whether the prisoner should be released early.
Difficult to predict
Lubanga is the first person to be convicted and sentenced by the ICC, so there are no direct precedents that the panel of judges can rely on. The international criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR) granted early release to the vast majority of prisoners, but it is not clear if the ICC will adopt this custom.
IJ Monitor has detailed the range of criteria that can weigh in either direction.
According to IJ Monitor, “there is no mathematical formula that judges can use to balance these conflicting factors and there is no jurisprudence indicating how the criteria should be interpreted. Unsurprisingly, the history of other international tribunals with similar provisions suggests that these decisions may be highly subjective and inevitably hard to predict.
“On balance, there does not appear to be a clear answer based on information available to the public. However, if the ICC does adopt a presumption in favour of early release similar to the [ICTY & ICTR], among the factors that weigh against Lubanga, his failure to admit to wrongdoing and his potential negative influence on the stability of the region, both politically and in the reconciliation process, could be serious enough to override that presumption.”
Lead image: Thomas Lubanga at the ICC (Photo: Michael Kooren/ANP)
Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice and peace.
Justice Hub reflects conversations on accountability and access to justice. We feature change-makers, researchers, and justice activists who make concrete the abstract concepts of Justice and Rule of Law. Justice Hub - alongside our sister project Hague Talks is powered by the Hague Project Peace and Justice – a network of over 200 Hague-based organisations working on peace and justice issues.
You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.